Christmas Bonus and Dismissal: What Are You Entitled To?

It depends on why your employer pays it. If it rewards work already performed, for example as a 13th month’s salary, you’re usually owed a pro-rata amount for the months you worked, even if you leave before the payment date. If it instead rewards pure loyalty to the company and your contract contains a valid cut-off date clause, the claim can lapse. What matters is the exact wording of your contract, not what the payment is called.

Reviewed by specialized labor lawyers · Updated: October 2026

The short answer: it depends on the purpose

There’s no statutory right to Christmas bonus. You won’t find the payment in any statute book, and no provision obliges your employer to make it. That sounds bad at first, but it isn’t: if Christmas bonus (Weihnachtsgeld) is set out in your employment contract, a works agreement, or a collective agreement, or if it has been paid for years, it becomes an enforceable part of your pay just like any other.

Whether you still receive the money after a dismissal, get to keep it, or have to repay it comes down to a single question: what is your employer actually paying it for? Does it reward your loyalty to the company, honouring the past and tying you to the future? Or does it simply pay for the work you’ve done during the current year? This classification decides whether a cut-off date clause applies, whether a repayment clause is valid, and whether you have a pro-rata claim for the months you worked.

The heading in the contract barely helps here. "Christmas bonus", "gratuity", "special payment", "13th month’s salary", or "annual special payment" are interchangeable labels. What matters is what the conditions actually say: is the payment reduced if you joined partway through the year? Is it reduced for absences? Both point to a link with work performed, and that changes the legal position entirely in your favour.

Important: if you’ve received a dismissal notice, a much stricter clock is running in parallel. You must file an unfair dismissal claim (Kündigungsschutzklage) against the dismissal itself within 3 weeks of receiving it (§ 4 KSchG). Find out what to do in these first days under Received a dismissal: what to do?

Where a claim to Christmas bonus can come from

No statute doesn’t mean no claim. There are four ways in which Christmas bonus becomes binding for your employer, and in practice people most often overlook the fourth.

1) The employment contract

The clearest case. If the payment is set out in your employment contract, it forms part of the pay owed to you under the contract, per § 611a BGB. Read the provision closely, because this is where the cut-off date, repayment, and discretionary reservation clauses that matter in a dispute are hidden. In pre-formulated contracts, which is practically always the case, these clauses are subject to standard-terms review under §§ 305 ff. BGB.

2) Works agreement

If your company has a works council (Betriebsrat), Christmas bonus may be regulated in a works agreement. It applies directly and mandatorily to all employees of the business, regardless of what your individual contract says. Ask the works council for the current version, that’s your right and only takes a phone call.

3) Collective agreement

If you’re bound by a collective agreement, or your contract refers to one, it often sets out an annual special payment with its own conditions, its own calculation method, and its own, often very short, time-bar clauses. Cut-off date rules in collective agreements aren’t subject to standard-terms content review, different standards apply here than for a standard-form employment contract.

4) Established company practice: the three-year rule

The most important route, and the one most often overlooked. If your employer pays the Christmas bonus unconditionally three years running, a claim arises under Federal Labour Court case law from established company practice (betriebliche Übung). Employees are entitled to conclude from this consistent conduct that the payment will continue in future, and that reliance is protected. No promise or anything in writing is needed, actual payment practice is enough.

The employer can only prevent this with a valid discretionary reservation (Freiwilligkeitsvorbehalt), and this is exactly where it often fails. A reservation that on one hand promises a legal claim and on the other excludes it ("the Christmas bonus is paid as a voluntary benefit to which no legal claim exists", placed right next to a firm commitment) is self-contradictory. Such clauses breach the transparency requirement of § 307 (1) sentence 2 BGB and are invalid. The popular combination of a discretionary and a revocation reservation within the same clause is also vulnerable, because it leaves you unable to tell where you stand. If the reservation falls away, the claim survives.

The principle of equal treatment in employment law also applies: if your employer pays a group of employees according to a recognisable rule and leaves you out without a valid reason, you can demand the payment too. Arbitrarily excluding certain individuals, for instance those who have just given or received notice, rarely survives this scrutiny.

Facing a dismissal, with open claims still on the table? Use our severance calculator to get an overview in 2 minutes of what your case could be worth overall.

The purpose decides everything

Now for the core issue. Case law distinguishes according to the purpose the special payment serves, and this classification automatically determines whether cut-off date and repayment clauses hold up.

Purpose of the payment Typical wording in the contract Cut-off date clause valid? Your claim on dismissal
Pure gratuity / loyalty bonus "in recognition of loyalty to the company", no reduction for absences, no pro-rating for joining partway through the year Generally yes Lapses if you’re no longer employed (or notice has been given) on the cut-off date
Payment for work performed "13th month’s salary", paid pro rata per month worked, reduction for absences provided for No, invalid Pro rata for every month you worked, regardless of who gave notice
Mixed character (both at once) Loyalty rationale in the wording, but pro-rating or absence reduction also provided for Invalid to the extent it claws back pay you’ve already earned Usually pro rata, at least for the work-related portion

The third row is the most common case in practice. Hardly any employment contract is worded cleanly enough to place the payment clearly into one of the two pure categories. This is a matter of interpretation, and the Federal Labour Court has also held cut-off date clauses invalid in mixed cases, to the extent they claw back pay already earned. The reasoning behind this is simple: a contract clause can’t retroactively take away what you’ve earned through work. That would be an unreasonable disadvantage under § 307 BGB.

Note: two indicators in the contract almost always point to a link with work performed, and so to your pro-rata claim: a rule that pro-rates for joining partway through the year, and a rule that reduces the payment for absences. Neither makes sense for a pure loyalty bonus, because loyalty to a company isn’t measured in hours worked.

Cut-off date clauses in detail: how to check your contract

A cut-off date clause ties the claim to the employment relationship still existing on a particular date. There are two variants, and the difference between them often decides several thousand euros.

1) The simple existence clause

Typical wording: "A claim exists only if the employment relationship still exists on 31 December of the year of payment." Here all that matters is whether the employment relationship is still running on that date. A notice already given doesn’t hurt, so long as the notice period only expires afterwards. If your employer gives notice in October effective 31 December, the employment relationship still exists on the cut-off date, and the claim arises.

2) The "notice-free" clause

Typical wording: "... only if the employment relationship exists free of notice (ungekündigt) on 31 December." This is the critical phrasing. It additionally requires that no notice has been given by the cut-off date, from either side. If you receive notice in November, or hand in your own, you lose the claim under a pure loyalty bonus, even though the employment relationship formally still exists on 31 December. So check whether this one word appears in your contract.

3) Combined with the notice period

The length of your notice period under § 622 BGB also decides whether you reach the cut-off date at all. With long service, the employment relationship often extends well into the following year; with summary dismissal, it ends immediately. Work out the exact end date before you negotiate any claims. You’ll find details on the calculation under ordinary dismissal.

4) How to check this in practice

Get out your employment contract, the works agreement, and, if relevant, the collective agreement, and answer four questions: is there a cut-off date? Does the word "ungekündigt" (notice-free) appear? Is the payment pro-rated for joining partway through the year? Is it reduced for absences? If the last two questions are answered yes, the payment is work-related, and the cut-off date clause stands on shaky ground, however clearly it’s worded.

Not sure what your contract actually says? Start with the severance calculator, then let us review your case, including any outstanding special payments.

Repayment clauses and their limits

The Christmas bonus lands in your account in December, you resign in January, and the repayment demand arrives in February. This situation comes up often, and the demand is frequently unjustified.

A repayment clause ties you to the business for a certain period. Because this restricts your occupational freedom protected under Article 12 of the Basic Law (GG), the Federal Labour Court has developed fixed sliding-scale limits. If the permitted tie-in period is exceeded, the clause is invalid in its entirety, rather than simply being scaled back to what’s allowed.

Amount of the special payment Permitted tie-in Practical consequence
up to €100 no tie-in allowed Repayment clause invalid, you keep the money
over €100, but below one month’s salary up to 31 March of the following year at most Leaving from 1 April onward triggers no repayment obligation
from one month’s salary upward up to 30 June of the following year at most Leaving from 1 July onward triggers no repayment obligation

Two further points that often prove decisive in practice. First: a repayment obligation is only ever conceivable for pure gratuities to begin with. If the payment rewards work performed, it’s already earned, and earned pay can’t be reclaimed. Second: a repayment obligation regularly doesn’t arise if the employer themselves gave notice for operational reasons. In that case you didn’t cause your departure, and it would be unfair to make you pay for their business decision. Find out what else may be available to you in this situation under dismissal for operational reasons and severance pay.

Important: don’t pay a repayment demand without checking it, and don’t sign any offset declaration for your final payslip. If your employer wants money back, they have to demonstrate that the clause is valid, not you that it’s invalid.

Two worked examples from practice

Theory is one thing, numbers another. The two cases below cover the most common situations.

Example 1: 13th month’s salary, leaving on 31 August

Tobias earns €3,600 gross a month. His employment contract provides for a "13th month’s salary", paid out in November, paid pro rata if joining partway through the year, and reduced for longer absences. Both features show the payment rewards work performed. The employment relationship ends on 31 August, so Tobias worked eight of the year’s twelve months.

Item Calculation Amount
Full 13th month’s salary 1 x €3,600 €3,600
Value per month employed €3,600 / 12 €300
Months worked (January to August) 8
Pro-rata claim 8 / 12 x €3,600 = 8 x €300 €2,400

A cut-off date clause that would reduce this claim to zero would be invalid here under Federal Labour Court case law, because it claws back pay already earned. It makes no difference whether Tobias resigned himself or was dismissed. The claim falls due on the contractually agreed payment date, not on the last working day, so it needs to be asserted in writing in good time.

Example 2: Pure gratuity with a cut-off date of 31 December

Sandra receives a "Christmas gratuity in recognition of loyalty to the company" every year. Her contract contains no pro-rating and no absence reduction, but does include the sentence: claim only if the employment relationship exists free of notice on 31 December. Sandra hands in her notice in mid-November, effective the end of the year.

The result isn’t good news for her: with a pure loyalty bonus, the cut-off date clause is generally valid, and because she gave her own notice in November, the employment relationship on 31 December is no longer free of notice. The claim lapses. Had she waited two more weeks and only resigned in January, the gratuity would have been due.

The situation flips if the employer gives notice. If they give notice in October effective 31 December, the employment relationship still exists on the cut-off date, but is no longer free of notice: everything here hinges on exactly this word. If it’s missing and the clause simply says "exists", the claim arises. And if the word is there, it’s worth checking whether the clause, viewed in the context of the whole contract, really describes a pure loyalty bonus or whether work performed is also being rewarded, because in that case the clause fails.

Keep in mind: if you resign yourself, you control the timing. Before you send your notice, check whether a cut-off date or repayment period is still running. A few weeks’ patience can be worth a full month’s salary here. If you’ve already resigned and regret it, read withdrawing your resignation.

And what is your case worth overall? The severance calculator gives you a reliable estimate in 2 minutes.

Keeping Christmas bonus and severance pay separate

This is where the costliest mistake on this whole topic happens, and it happens quietly. Christmas bonus and severance pay both feel like "money at the end", but they’re fundamentally different in legal and tax terms.

Christmas bonus Severance pay
Legal nature Pay, consideration for work or loyalty to the company Compensation for the loss of your job
Payroll tax Fully taxable, processed as a separate item with its own calculation Taxable, but potentially at a reduced rate under § 34 EStG
Social security Subject to contributions (one-off payment) Exempt from contributions
Legal basis Contract, works agreement, collective agreement, established company practice Usually a settlement or termination agreement, only exceptionally by statute

Because severance pay is exempt from social security contributions and can benefit from favourable tax treatment via the one-fifth rule (Fünftelregelung) under § 34 EStG, it’s usually worth considerably more per gross euro than Christmas bonus. Read everything on taxation under severance pay and tax, on realistic amounts under severance pay: amount, and on the fundamentals under severance pay in employment law.

The costly mistake: almost every termination agreement and settlement agreement ends with a settlement clause (Ausgleichsklausel), often along the lines of "upon fulfilment of this agreement, all mutual claims arising from the employment relationship are settled". This single sentence wipes out your outstanding Christmas bonus along with it, as well as any remaining leave, unpaid commission, and overtime. You’ll then have negotiated only over the severance pay, and given away open claims worth several months’ salary.

The right approach is to expressly exclude and quantify any outstanding special payments in the agreement, or to regulate them separately from the severance pay, with their own due date. We show you what else to watch for in the contract text under termination agreement: template. And if you’re still weighing up the decision, termination agreement or dismissal? helps you get your bearings.

Release from work, sickness, and parental leave

After a dismissal you’re often released from work, and then the question arises whether a payment is still due for a period during which you weren’t actually at the company at all.

With an irrevocable release from work, your right to pay continues, because the employer is in default of acceptance under § 615 BGB. They’re voluntarily foregoing your work, and that mustn’t leave you worse off. This usually also applies to work-related special payments: the released period counts towards the pro-rating. Read what else distinguishes revocable from irrevocable release, particularly regarding leave and other income earned in the meantime, under release from work.

A reduction for sickness is only permitted if it’s expressly agreed, and even then only within the narrow limits of § 4a EFZG: at most a quarter of the pay that, averaged over the year, falls on one working day, per day of sick leave. Without an express agreement, no reduction is allowed at all. This is particularly relevant if dismissal for long absences due to illness is on the table, see dismissal due to illness.

During parental leave, your employer may reduce the work-related part of the special payment pro rata, because both sides’ main obligations are suspended during this time. The loyalty-related part remains unaffected. Find out what other protections apply during this period under dismissal during parental leave.

Deadlines: when your claim lapses

Even the best claim is useless once it’s lapsed. And with Christmas bonus, claims lapse faster than in almost any other area, because two different clocks are running.

Time-bar clauses (Ausschlussfristen, also called Verfallfristen) appear in many employment contracts and nearly all collective agreements. They require you to assert claims within a short period from when they fall due, often three months. Miss it, and the claim is gone, even if it was undisputed. Under Federal Labour Court case law, such periods in pre-formulated contracts may not fall below three months, or they would unreasonably disadvantage you (§ 307 BGB). If the clause additionally demands a stricter form than text form for asserting the claim, such as mandatory handwritten signature, it’s invalid under § 309 No. 13 BGB. Never rely on that, though: assert the claim in good time and in the right form regardless.

If there’s no time-bar clause, the standard limitation period of three years under § 195 BGB applies. Under § 199 BGB it only starts at the end of the year in which the claim arose and you became aware of it. A Christmas bonus that fell due in November only becomes time-barred three years after the end of that calendar year. That’s generous, but it won’t help you if a time-bar clause also applies, because that takes precedence.

In practice this means: assert your claim in writing, and make sure you can prove it was received. A letter with a specific amount, a payment deadline, and provable delivery, sent by recorded delivery or handed over in person against a receipt. Asking HR verbally doesn’t preserve any deadline and can’t be proved later.

Special case: employer insolvency

If your employer is insolvent, a third clock is added. Christmas bonus that fell due before insolvency proceedings opened is an ordinary insolvency claim: you register it with the insolvency table and ultimately only receive the quota, which is usually low. Claims arising only after proceedings open, by contrast, are estate claims (Masseforderungen) and are paid preferentially.

For the last three months before insolvency proceedings open, insolvency benefit (Insolvenzgeld) from the employment agency (Agentur für Arbeit) steps in (§ 165 SGB III), and it also covers pro-rata Christmas bonus attributable to that period. A time bar of two months from the opening of insolvency proceedings applies, so submit your application immediately. Find everything else, especially what happens to a negotiated severance payment in this situation, under severance pay in insolvency.

What you should do now

Whether you’ve already been dismissed or are planning to resign yourself: the order of these steps decides whether you actually see the money.

  1. Gather your documents. Your employment contract with all amendments, the works agreement, and, if relevant, the collective agreement. Search specifically for the terms "special payment", "gratuity", "13th month’s salary", "cut-off date", "ungekündigt" (notice-free), "repayment", and "voluntary".
  2. Work out the purpose of the payment. Is it pro-rated for joining partway through the year? Is it reduced for absences? If the provisions point to a link with work performed, cut-off date and repayment clauses stand on shaky ground.
  3. Document the payment history of the last three years. Find your payslips and bank statements and note the amount and date of each payment. Three payments made unconditionally establish an established company practice, and that gives you a claim even if the contract says nothing about it.
  4. Check the time-bar period and assert the claim in writing. A specific amount, the relevant period, a concrete payment deadline, and provable delivery. Don’t wait for your final payslip, it often only arrives after the deadline has passed.
  5. If you’ve been dismissed, keep the 3-week deadline in mind. An unfair dismissal claim (Kündigungsschutzklage) is the lever that lets you negotiate the whole package, including any outstanding special payments.
  6. Don’t let anything be settled in a blanket clause. Don’t sign a settlement clause that doesn’t expressly exclude or quantify your Christmas bonus, and don’t pay a repayment demand without checking it first.
  7. If you’re resigning yourself, choose the timing deliberately. If a cut-off date or repayment tie-in is still running, resigning a little later can mean real money.

First, get an overview of your overall leverage: The severance calculator gives you your personal estimate in 2 minutes.

How can we help you?

Whether your Christmas bonus is still due, whether you get to keep it, and whether your employer’s repayment demand actually holds up, all comes down to a few sentences in your contract. We look at exactly these together with lawyers specialising in employment law: does the cut-off date clause hold up? Does the repayment scale apply correctly? Is the discretionary reservation transparent? And what’s realistically achievable in the overall package of severance pay, reference, and outstanding payments?

We carry the risk: paid only on success, at no upfront cost. Start with an initial assessment via our severance calculator, it only takes 2 minutes. And keep an eye on the time-bar deadline in your contract, it keeps quietly running in the background.

Frequently asked questions

It depends on why your employer pays it. If it rewards work already performed, for example as a 13th month’s salary, you’re usually owed a pro-rata amount for the months you worked, even if you leave before the payment date. If it instead rewards pure loyalty to the company and your contract contains a valid cut-off date clause, the claim can lapse. What matters is the exact wording of your contract, not what the payment is called.

Need legal support?

Our labor lawyers review your case free of charge and without obligation.